就业英语作文四级范文 四级英语作文题目及范文

Nowadays, there are more and more [某种现象] in [某种场合]. It is estimated that [相关数据]. Why have there been so many [某种现象]? Maybe the reasons can be listed as follows. The first one is [原因一]. Besides, [原因二]. The third one is [原因三]. To sum up, the main cause of [某种现象] is due to [最主要原因]. It is high time that something were done upon it. For one thing, [解决办法一]. On the other hand, [解决办法二]. All these measures will certainly reduce the number of [某种现象].

Nowadays, there are more and more [ghost writers / 枪手] in [China's examinations / 中国的考场]. It is estimated that [5% examinees are ghost writers / 5%的应试者是枪手]. Why have there been so many [ghost writers / 枪手]? Maybe the reasons can be listed as follows. The first one is [hirers' ignorance / 雇主无知]. Besides, [hirers' indolence / 雇主懒惰]. The third one is [hirers' obtusity / 雇主迟钝]. To sum up, the main cause of [ghost writers / 枪手] is due to [hirers' low IQ / 雇主智商低]. It is high time that something were done upon it. For one thing, [flagellation / 鞭打]. On the other hand, [decapitation / 斩首]. All these measures will certainly reduce the number of [ghost writers / 枪手].

尽可能的睁大眼睛，总分460，噢耶，过了!425过四级，想起来复习的日子，厚厚的一本四级单词，还有十套题，其实我没背多少单词，题也只是考前做了几套。但是每天都看一部英文电影，锻炼听力，做题的时候，每个类型题都认真的分析，琢磨。作文也看过很多，这是我第二次考英语四级了，分析第一次的成绩，有听力，阅读，作文和翻译，这三部分我的得分都不高，一百二十多分，总分是358，这次我苦练听力，做阅读的时候也很认真，单词虽然没背完一本，但是也背了百页。

这次成绩比上次提高了一百多分，我也很高兴，也为自己感到自豪，我的作文和翻译部分不好，这次也不例外，听力和阅读都是一百七。

刚刚结束考试的时候感觉答的还不错，但是一想到单词没背完，心里也是没有底。回宿舍以后，室友都在讨论题目，每人的题目不同。室友也都考了，可惜的是算我总共两个人过了。问了问我以前的同学，也没有过，不过她们都是第一次考，还有机会。

在微博里也搜了一下四级，看到很多人发的都是四级，当然还有六级，如果时间充足，我也把六级过了，以后成为英语老师也是可以的，哈哈，加油。

【英语四级作文精选8篇】

Liberal arts science of choice has always been a headache problem, many people in the wrong direction outset. When the thought of the liberal arts or science, a lot of students and parents, the first thought is "liberal arts science which future employment prospects better? More promising?" In fact, the question itself is wrong. Because no matter liberal arts science, corresponds to a lot of professional, we have a good professional, but also have relatively less Haozhaogongzuo professional, such as liberal arts in the history of philosophy, science of geology archeology, arts and science be compared directly without significance. And, no matter what profession, even relatively poor professional, if we can learn well, can still have a good future, even if is a good professional, if the school mess, nor Haozhaogongzuo.

Therefore, the key issue is not the liberal arts or science which is better, but I'm more suited to study liberal arts or science? On both subjects, which can play to my strengths, which I was able to learn better, which is what I really interested in? Only to find answers to these questions, we can make the right choice.

For themselves, can learn, are interested in the future will be able to get good grades in the entrance into a good school and a good professional, there will be more ambitious future. This is the crux of the problem, leave these things to talk about the merits of arts and sciences, is the paper.

I am in high school, when faced with the choice, liberal arts science scores actually very good. My homeroom teacher pulled me into the office gave me two hours of ideological work, strongly suggested that I read the science, because she thinks science is more promising, but the most important reason is that the choice of science to study the future of liberal arts transfer very easy. If you choose the arts, the future transfer of science is almost impossible. But I still resolutely chose the arts, because I believe that my expertise and interest in this, the last I to Jiangjin first liberal arts, she was admitted the Renmin University of China Law School. Now, my own choice was still satisfied.

Objectively speaking, the difference between arts and science teacher, I say most of them are true. My graduate school of economics, which is a traditional liberal arts majors, but the class has a lot of high school and undergraduate students are learning science, and some school mapping, prospecting and some to learn, even people learn aircraft manufacturing. But they still can learn good economics. And if I now want to study university physics chemistry and the like, it is almost impossible. In this sense, science is indeed wider than the choices liberal arts.

But no matter how wide of a person's choices, and finally he just like other people, can only choose one path to development. I love the arts, like economics, but also to learn them well, that's enough, why are we even have the ability to make their own learning university physics it? I am now engaged in writing, speaking, etc. activities, both of my high school, liberal arts university foundation inseparable, and this is exactly what I am most interested in, therefore I am very happy.

If I had chosen science, I believe the results will be good, but it is absolutely impossible to test the city's first. Because the arts are my most suitable and favorite subjects, but science is not.

Advantage is the choice of a wide range of science, but also to learn something more professional, more clearly when the direction of employment, competition is relatively small. If you study the bio-engineering, then on the job in this direction, such as economics or other professional bridge design, telecommunications aspect of students who simply can not compete with you. But if you learn is marketing, then the job recruitment marketing staff, in fact, almost all liberal arts school who have the potential to compete with you - though you'll comparative advantage, but this advantage is not bio-engineering for bridges designed so absolute.

But science problems will be here, will limit your professional direction you looking for a job, almost no competition in the engineering student was in addition to other aspects of biological relevance. Although you can go to choose marketing or business management class work, but this means that you are in high school and college years expertise in four years of study is almost entirely void, must re-start. And arts professionals, in this respect is much better to deal with, such as my undergraduate studies in law, economics graduate study, but the study of the process of the economy has a good knowledge of the law and legal logic is obviously also helpful, "The law of economy Analysis "is also serious when I was in undergraduate study before.

Science learning there is a very serious problem, that is, if you really learn well on a subject, then the subject is substantially even finished, it will pull down with the best students astonishing gap. I take the well-known mathematical terms, outstanding students more than 130 points in mathematics college entrance examination is normal, but if someone really learn bad math, then the 30 minutes and 40 minutes is normal. And in the language, such political subjects, there would be so amazing gap. College Entrance politics, history, languages are difficult test to 130 points or more, but it is not easy test to 80 points or less.

So, if you are good in science subjects, while no interest in political history, then obviously choose science. If the contrary is clearly choose liberal arts. If you have a door in Chemical Physics think there is no way, but also learn bad political history, then I think the best choice liberal arts, because a poor physical chemistry might be someone else pulled out or even several percentage , and political history as long as a lot of effort to learn, how the others will not be dragged into such a big gap.

As for mathematics, for a liberal arts students is concerned, if he has an advantage in that regard, then he studied liberal arts can protect themselves get a good result in the college entrance examination. If a student of mathematics feel totally powerless, then the best choice is still the liberal arts.

Really painful is that the average score, as if what subjects are not particularly outstanding, but what subjects are not particularly good student. This time the most important thing is to look at the individual interest. If you are determined to engage in legal profession, then you should choose the arts, although science students also read the law no problem, but when a good school for your future political history knowledge learning law is clearly a great benefit. If you're really on the political history of these things is not cold, and like some of the more objective and more simple things like calculate the figures, then do not choose the reluctance of the liberal arts. "Interest is the best teacher," the power of this sentence, the longer able to highlight its power. Contrary to their own inner preferences, because of some other reason, they did not choose the subject of interest, be able to learn even a little while, a long time, always tired, feel the pain, feeling wavering.金大话英语培训网

When you are not sure what they do best liberal arts or science or liberal arts or science prefer when there is a way to close your eyes, imagine yourself in the future most want to be what kind of person? A scientist, an economist, a politician, a building designer or whatever occupation. Then ask yourself, to become such a figure, most should have knowledge of what is a partial text or partial reason, this time, you will find the right answer.